This is Your Brain On

Andy Ihnatko has a interesting article up on the Chicaco Sun-Times that should be read by every graduate student. In short, he summarizes a few of the key points made by Matt Richtel on a recent interview with NPR’s Fresh Air about how the brain doesn’t really multi-task and that whenever we try to do so we are cheating ourselves out of our potential. I haven’t listened to the Fresh Air interview yet, but I’ve been becoming more and more aware of how important it is to focus on things you care about, whether that is writing creative fiction, returning emails, putting together a lesson plan, or reading an article, etc. Now, we are, it appears, wired to lose focus pretty quickly. As Ihnatko put it (with his usual flair for style and humor):

Distraction is a feature of our OS, a bit of legacy code designed to keep us alive as cavemen. We were smart enough and creative enough to figure out how to turn a chunk of volcanic glass into an axe head, but we’d get killed if we got so wrapped up in the creative process that the sound of a hungry growl from the nearby bushes failed to instantly command our full attention.

So in a way, every time there’s something clamoring for our attention in our peripheral perception — be it a sound or something visual — some old part of our brain processes it as a downscaled version of a panther attack.Distraction is a feature of our OS, a bit of legacy code designed to keep us alive as cavemen. We were smart enough and creative enough to figure out how to turn a chunk of volcanic glass into an axe head, but we’d get killed if we got so wrapped up in the creative process that the sound of a hungry growl from the nearby bushes failed to instantly command our full attention.

So in a way, every time there’s something clamoring for our attention in our peripheral perception — be it a sound or something visual — some old part of our brain processes it as a downscaled version of a panther attack.

Ihnatko proceeds to cover some of his own attempts to change his relationship to distraction.

I suggest you read his entire article here and you can find the Fresh Air podcast here.

Of course, as graduate students, our attention is finite and our tasks seemingly infinite, so how do we try to minimize distractions and focus on the task at hand when our brain keeps worrying about the 12 other articles we need to read, the research that we should have done yesterday, the grading that needs to be done, the paper that needs to be researched, and the laundry, grocery shopping, apartment cleaning that somehow don’t magically happen by themselves?

Good question. Though I think minimizing distractions from Facebook and Twitter and email might be a good place to start. Also, I think the admonishment that Ihnatko takes from Richtel about letting yourself have some time to do nothing and to not fear boredom is very important. I know that often I’ll be in such a hurry to get through my reading for a class that I don’t take the time to reflect on an article after finishing it, or even just let my brain rest for a few minutes before going on to the next task. I’m definitely going to start being more aware of taking the time to let my brain take a break. Next week I’ll try not to check Twitter and Facebook and my RSS feeds on my phone while on the bus to school and instead just relax and soft focus on the world around me and let subconscious do its thing without my conscious mind being bombarded with information–much of it not even remotely important–constantly.

Not Pursuing a PhD in Paradise

While getting the chance to live in Hawaii for several years would have been nice–well, no, not so much “nice” as frakin’ fantastic–and while the Theatre Department at U of Hawaii has a very strong Asian theatre component that interests me, I will not be taking their offer. In large part, the decision comes down to money. A month ago I spoke to a faculty member there and was informed that they couldn’t guarantee assistantships on a year-to-year basis and that there was no real hope of tuition waivers. As excited as I had been about moving to Hawaii and studying there, this news meant that, unless I found a wealthy sugar-mama damn quick, studying at the University of Hawaii would not be possible.

I really love Hawaii and have had the opportunity to visit there three times in the past. Kauai in particular has affected me deeply and it is hard to explain just how much the quality of the air there can serve as a mental and emotional balm. Of course, U of Hawaii is not on Kauai, and each of the islands have remarkable differences. Still, I have experienced as sense of quiet and peacefulness while on Kauai that I believe would translate to any of the islands. However, I don’t love it to the extent that I’m going to take out the amount of Stafford loans necessary to live and study there and add them to my already uncomfortably large student loan debt.

That said, Pitt will offer me a better program in any number of ways, not the least of which is the fact that I very much want to work with Dr. Bruce McConachie in the exploration of how cognitive sciences can be fruitfully used by scholars to understand performance. As scientists learn more about how our minds meaning from the ocean of raw data surrounding us, the applications to performance are both exciting and hugely important for the future of performance scholars and artists. I have always been an admirer of science–in a profoundly lay-person, non-mathematical way to be sure, but still, a great admirer. Neuroscience and cognitive science will never provide all the answers necessary to understand the enjoyment of a play or a dance (or, for that matter, the extreme anger that many people exhibit toward mimes), but as we learn more about our minds and cognitive processes, turning away from such knowledge in blind allegiance to paradigms past is not going to move theatre, or the understanding of theatre, forward.

There are a few scholars who are starting down this path, and Dr. McConachie is in the vanguard of this group. The opportunity to really delve into the questions that the cognitive sciences raise for theatre and performance scholars will help both scholars and artists understand performance in new ways, and I genuinely want to be part of that conversation. Additionally, I expect these questions will stretch my brain into new configurations and patterns.

Exactly what I want from a learning experience.

Powered by ScribeFire.